CIC TEST BOOK, EXAMCOLLECTION CIC DUMPS TORRENT

CIC Test Book, Examcollection CIC Dumps Torrent

CIC Test Book, Examcollection CIC Dumps Torrent

Blog Article

Tags: CIC Test Book, Examcollection CIC Dumps Torrent, CIC Excellect Pass Rate, CIC Exam Pattern, CIC Study Center

As is known to all, CIC practice test simulation plays an important part in the success of exams. By simulation, you can get the hang of the situation of the real exam with the help of our free demo of CIC exam questions. Just as an old saying goes, knowing the enemy and yourself, you can fight a hundred battles with no danger of defeat. Simulation of our CIC Training Materials make it possible to have a clear understanding of what your strong points and weak points are and at the same time, you can learn comprehensively about the CIC exam and pass it easily.

Therefore, you have the option to use CBIC CIC PDF questions anywhere and anytime. CIC dumps are designed according to the CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam (CIC) certification exam standard and have hundreds of questions similar to the actual CIC Exam. Pass4sures CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam (CIC) web-based practice exam software also works without installation.

>> CIC Test Book <<

Examcollection CIC Dumps Torrent & CIC Excellect Pass Rate

Our company is considerably cautious in the selection of talent and always hires employees with store of specialized knowledge and skills on our CIC exam questions. All the members of our experts and working staff maintain a high sense of responsibility, which is why there are so many people choose our CIC Exam Materials and to be our long-term partner. For we carry forward the spirit of "firm & indomitable, developing & innovative, achieving the first class", serving customers with all our heart and soul with our wonderful CIC practice braindumps.

CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam Sample Questions (Q76-Q81):

NEW QUESTION # 76
Which of the following stains is used to identify mycobacteria?

  • A. Gram
  • B. India ink
  • C. Acid-fast
  • D. Methylene blue

Answer: C

Explanation:
Mycobacteria, including species such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae, are a group of bacteria known for their unique cell wall composition, which contains a high amount of lipid-rich mycolic acids. This characteristic makes them resistant to conventional staining methods and necessitates the use of specialized techniques for identification. The acid-fast stain is the standard method for identifying mycobacteria in clinical and laboratory settings. This staining technique, developed by Ziehl-Neelsen, involves the use of carbol fuchsin, which penetrates the lipid-rich cell wall of mycobacteria. After staining, the sample is treated with acid-alcohol, which decolorizes non-acid-fast organisms, while mycobacteria retain the red color due to their resistance to decolorization-hence the term "acid-fast." This property allows infection preventionists and microbiologists to distinguish mycobacteria from other bacteria under a microscope.
Option B, the Gram stain, is a common differential staining technique used to classify most bacteria into Gram-positive or Gram-negative based on the structure of their cell walls. However, mycobacteria do not stain reliably with the Gram method due to their thick, waxy cell walls, rendering it ineffective for their identification. Option C, methylene blue, is a simple stain used to observe bacterial morphology or as a counterstain in other techniques (e.g., Gram staining), but it lacks the specificity to identify mycobacteria.
Option D, India ink, is used primarily to detect encapsulated organisms such as Cryptococcus neoformans by creating a negative staining effect around the capsule, and it is not suitable for mycobacteria.
The CBIC's "Identification of Infectious Disease Processes" domain underscores the importance of accurate diagnostic methods in infection control, including the use of appropriate staining techniques to identify pathogens like mycobacteria. The acid-fast stain is specifically recommended by the CDC and WHO for the initial detection of mycobacterial infections, such as tuberculosis, in clinical specimens (CDC, Laboratory Identification of Mycobacteria, 2008). This aligns with the CBIC Practice Analysis (2022), which emphasizes the role of laboratory diagnostics in supporting infection prevention strategies.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Laboratory Identification of Mycobacteria, 2008.
* WHO Guidelines for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Tuberculosis, 2014.


NEW QUESTION # 77
Which of the following factors increases a patient's risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)?

  • A. In-line suction
  • B. Acute lung disease
  • C. Hypoxia
  • D. Nasogastric tube

Answer: D

Explanation:
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a type of healthcare-associated pneumonia that occurs in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes identifying risk factors for VAP in the "Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases" domain, aligning with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for preventing ventilator-associated events. The question requires identifying which factor among the options increases a patient's risk of developing VAP, based on evidence from clinical and epidemiological data.
Option B, "Nasogastric tube," is the correct answer. The presence of a nasogastric tube is a well-documented risk factor for VAP. This tube can facilitate the aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions or gastric contents into the lower respiratory tract, bypassing natural defense mechanisms like the epiglottis. The CDC's "Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia" (2004) and studies in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (e.g., Kollef et al., 2005) highlight that nasogastric tubes increase VAP risk by promoting microaspiration, especially if improperly managed or if the patient has impaired gag reflexes. This mechanical disruption of the airway's protective barriers is a direct contributor to infection.
Option A, "Hypoxia," refers to low oxygen levels in the blood, which can be a consequence of lung conditions or VAP but is not a primary risk factor for developing it. Hypoxia may indicate underlying respiratory compromise, but it does not directly increase the likelihood of VAP unless associated with other factors (e.g., prolonged ventilation). Option C, "Acute lung disease," is a broad term that could include conditions like acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which may predispose patients to VAP due to prolonged ventilation needs. However, acute lung disease itself is not a specific risk factor; rather, it is the need for mechanical ventilation that elevates risk, making this less direct than the nasogastric tube effect.
Option D, "In-line suction," involves a closed-system method for clearing respiratory secretions, which is designed to reduce VAP risk by minimizing contamination during suctioning. The CDC and evidence-based guidelines (e.g., American Thoracic Society, 2016) recommend in-line suction to prevent infection, suggesting it decreases rather than increases VAP risk.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines prioritize identifying modifiable risk factors like nasogastric tubes for targeted prevention strategies (e.g., elevating the head of the bed to reduce aspiration).
Option B stands out as the factor most consistently linked to increased VAP risk based on clinical evidence.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, 2004.
* Kollef, M. H., et al. (2005). The Impact of Nasogastric Tubes on VAP. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
* American Thoracic Society Guidelines on VAP Prevention, 2016.


NEW QUESTION # 78
An 84-year-old male with a gangrenous foot is admitted to the hospital from an extended-care facility (ECF).
The ECF is notified that the wound grew Enterococcus faecium with the following antibiotic sensitivity results:
ampicillin - R
vancomycin - R
penicillin - R
linezolid - S
This is the fourth Enterococcus species cultured from residents within the same ECF wing in the past month.
The other cultures were from two urine specimens and a draining wound. The Infection Preventionist (IP) should immediately:

  • A. Compare the four culture reports and sensitivity patterns.
  • B. Notify the medical director of the outbreak.
  • C. Notify the nursing administrator to close the wing to new admissions.
  • D. Conduct surveillance cultures for this organism in all residents.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The scenario describes a potential outbreak of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an extended-care facility (ECF) wing, indicated by four positive cultures (including the current case and three prior cases from urine and a draining wound) within a month. The organism exhibits resistance to ampicillin, vancomycin, and penicillin, but sensitivity to linezolid, suggesting a possible vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) strain, which is a significant concern in healthcare settings. The Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) emphasizes the importance of rapid outbreak detection and response in the
"Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain, aligning with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for managing multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).
Option A, "Notify the medical director of the outbreak," is the most immediate and critical action. Identifying an outbreak-defined by the CDC as two or more cases of a similar illness linked by time and place-requires prompt notification to the facility's leadership (e.g., medical director) to initiate a coordinated response. The presence of four Enterococcus cases, including a multidrug-resistant strain, within a single ECF wing over a month suggests a potential cluster, necessitating urgent action to assess the scope, implement control measures, and allocate resources. The CDC's "Management of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Healthcare Settings" (2006) recommends immediate reporting to facility leadership as the first step to activate an outbreak investigation team, making this the priority.
Option B, "Compare the four culture reports and sensitivity patterns," is an important subsequent step in outbreak investigation. Analyzing the antibiotic susceptibility profiles and culture sources can confirm whether the cases are epidemiologically linked (e.g., clonal spread of VRE) and guide treatment and control strategies. However, this is a detailed analysis that follows initial notification and should not delay alerting the medical director. Option C, "Conduct surveillance cultures for this organism in all residents," is a proactive measure to determine the prevalence of Enterococcus faecium, especially VRE, within the wing. The CDC recommends targeted surveillance during outbreaks, but this requires prior authorization and planning by the outbreak team, making it a secondary action after notification. Option D, "Notify the nursing administrator to close the wing to new admissions," may be a control measure to prevent further spread, as suggested by the CDC for MDRO outbreaks. However, closing a unit is a significant decision that should be guided by the medical director and infection control team after assessing the situation, not an immediate independent action by the IP.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) and CDC guidelines prioritize rapid communication with leadership to initiate a structured outbreak response, including resource allocation and policy adjustments. Given the multidrug-resistant nature and cluster pattern, notifying the medical director (Option A) is the most immediate and appropriate action to ensure a comprehensive response.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Management of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Healthcare Settings, 2006.


NEW QUESTION # 79
Based on the compiled results of learner needs assessments, the staff has an interest in hepatitis B, wound care, and continuing education credits. What should be the infection preventionist's next step?

  • A. Write program goals and objectives
  • B. Conduct personal interviews with the staff
  • C. Directly observe behavioral changes
  • D. Offer a lecture on hepatitis B and wound care

Answer: A

Explanation:
The infection preventionist's (IP) next step, based on the compiled results of learner needs assessments indicating staff interest in hepatitis B, wound care, and continuing education credits, should be to write program goals and objectives. This step is critical in the educational planning process, as outlined by the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines. According to CBIC, effective infection prevention education programs begin with a structured approach that includes defining clear goals and objectives tailored to the identified needs of the learners (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV:
Education and Research, Competency 4.1 - Develop and implement educational programs). Writing program goals and objectives ensures that the educational content aligns with the staff's interests and professional development needs, such as understanding hepatitis B prevention, wound care techniques, and earning continuing education credits. This step provides a foundation for designing relevant and measurable outcomes, which can later guide the development of lectures, training materials, or other interventions.
Option A (conduct personal interviews with the staff) is less appropriate as the next step because the needs assessment has already been completed, providing sufficient data on staff interests. Additional interviews might be useful for refining details but are not the immediate priority. Option B (offer a lecture on hepatitis B and wound care) is a subsequent action that follows the establishment of goals and objectives, as delivering content without a structured plan may lack focus or fail to meet educational standards. Option D (directly observe behavioral changes) is an evaluation step that occurs after the education program has been implemented and is not the initial action required.
By starting with program goals and objectives, the IP ensures a systematic approach that adheres to CBIC's emphasis on evidence-based education and continuous improvement in infection prevention practices. This process also facilitates collaboration with stakeholders to meet accreditation or certification requirements, such as those for continuing education credits.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain IV: Education and Research, Competency 4.1 - Develop and implement educational programs.


NEW QUESTION # 80
An infection preventionist (IP) observes an increase in primary bloodstream infections in patients admitted through the Emergency Department. Poor technique is suspected when peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters are inserted. The IP should FIRST stratify infections by:

  • A. Type of dressing used: gauze, CHG impregnated sponge, or transparent.
  • B. Location of IV insertion: pre-hospital, Emergency Department, or in-patient unit.
  • C. Type of skin preparation used for the IV site: alcohol, CHG/alcohol, or iodophor.
  • D. Site of insertion: hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa.

Answer: B

Explanation:
When an infection preventionist (IP) identifies an increase in primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter insertion, the initial step in outbreak investigation and process improvement is to stratify the data to identify potential sources or patterns of infection. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC), the "Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain emphasizes the importance of systematically analyzing data to pinpoint contributing factors, such as location, technique, or equipment use, in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The question specifies poor technique as a suspected cause, and the first step should focus on contextual factors that could influence technique variability.
Option A, stratifying infections by the location of IV insertion (pre-hospital, Emergency Department, or in- patient unit), is the most logical first step. Different settings may involve varying levels of training, staffing, time pressure, or adherence to aseptic technique, all of which can impact infection rates. For example, pre- hospital settings (e.g., ambulance services) may have less controlled environments or less experienced personnel compared to in-patient units, potentially leading to technique inconsistencies. The CDC's Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections (2017) recommend evaluating the context of catheter insertion as a critical initial step in investigating BSIs, making this a priority for the IP to identify where the issue is most prevalent.
Option B, stratifying by the type of dressing used (gauze, CHG impregnated sponge, or transparent), is important but should follow initial location-based analysis. Dressings play a role in maintaining catheter site integrity and preventing infection, but their impact is secondary to the insertion technique itself. Option C, stratifying by the site of insertion (hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa), is also relevant, as anatomical sites differ in infection risk (e.g., the hand may be more prone to contamination), but this is a more specific factor to explore after broader contextual data is assessed. Option D, stratifying by the type of skin preparation used (alcohol, CHG/alcohol, or iodophor), addresses antiseptic efficacy, which is a key component of technique.
However, without first understanding where the insertions occur, it's premature to focus on skin preparation alone, as technique issues may stem from systemic factors across locations.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) supports a stepwise approach to HAI investigation, starting with broad stratification (e.g., by location) to guide subsequent detailed analysis (e.g., technique-specific factors). This aligns with the CDC's hierarchical approach to infection prevention, where contextual data collection precedes granular process evaluation. Therefore, the IP should first stratify by location to establish a baseline for further investigation.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, 2017.


NEW QUESTION # 81
......

The CIC Exam is one of the best platforms that have been helping the CBIC CIC exam candidates in their preparation. Several CBIC CIC exam candidates have already passed their CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam exam with good scores. They all used the Exams. CIC Exam Questions and got success in the final CBIC CIC exam easily.

Examcollection CIC Dumps Torrent: https://www.pass4sures.top/Infection-Control/CIC-testking-braindumps.html

The CIC practice questions at Pass4sures CIC cover all the key topics and areas of knowledge necessary to get success on the first try, CBIC CIC Test Book That is why we win a great deal of customers around the world, You can make use of your spare moment to study our CIC preparation questions, Please review the following text for details of Warranty policy: In case of failure in your Certification Exam, Pass4sures Examcollection CIC Dumps Torrent.com will provide you with Money Back Warranty, without any delay.

Where is a rule implemented, It will also spare CIC the program from having to define the null indicators in working storage, The CIC practice questions at Pass4sures CIC cover all the key topics and areas of knowledge necessary to get success on the first try.

Hot CIC Test Book 100% Pass | High-quality Examcollection CIC Dumps Torrent: CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam

That is why we win a great deal of customers around the world, You can make use of your spare moment to study our CIC preparation questions, Please review the following text for details of Warranty policy: In case of failure CIC Test Book in your Certification Exam, Pass4sures.com will provide you with Money Back Warranty, without any delay.

All the advandages of our CIC exam braindumps prove that we are the first-class vendor in this career and have authority to ensure your success in your first try on CIC exam.

Report this page